One of the smaller houses that I have designed was a
cottage-sized dwelling with a
footprint of 800 sq.ft. Despite the apparently small size, the house had three bedrooms, two baths and ample living & storage space.
Having lived in +/- 400 sq.ft. on several occasions myself, I find that can be plenty of space, if you
don’t own too much ‘stuff’ . An
open plan will increase the apparent living area.
Extending the living areas into the outdoors by means of decks, porches or balconies also adds to the sense of space. Even more appealing is attractive surrounding outdoor property.
In this case the client had a
rural property with river frontage, so the whole property had the feel of a casual cottage setting suited to outdoor living. The client planned to have friends help with the construction, so the building was to be
simple & straightforward. The house shape decided upon was a
rectangle - almost a square actually, which is the most efficient area (has the least exterior wall area).
One-and-a-half storeys with a simple gable roof would allow for a
usable attic with half-height pony walls on the sides & full height in the center, almost doubling the available floor area. The main level was to have living, dining, and kitchen areas, three-piece bath, laundry/utility room, and a bedroom, as well as the stairs to the attic level. A
wood stove on the main level was to be the main heat source for the entire house. The attic would have two bedrooms and a full bath.
The rear of the house faced the river so the rooms were to
take advantage of the views and access.
Any
vehicles would be parked outdoors. Even a single-car garage easily requires 300-400 sq.ft. –a lot of money to spend on constructing shelter for an object, rather than for people.
How did all this manage to fit into the building footprint? Stay tuned for the interior floor plans.